Brian Dabul vs Catalin-Ionut Gard Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L W L L
Form
W W W L W W L L W LH2H: Dabul 1 - 0 Gard
They have played 3 sets in total, with Dabul winning 2 and Gard winning 1. The last match between Dabul and Gard was at the Seguros Bolivar Open - Medellin, 05-10-2007, Quarterfinals, Clay with Brian Dabul getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brian Dabul | 1 |
| Catalin-Ionut Gard | 0 |
Seguros Bolivar Open - Medellin(05-10-2007)
6
7
6
4
6
4
| Dabul | Stats | Gard |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 82 | Highest Rank | 224 |
| 41 | Age | 43 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 11 |
| 59% (342-234) | Career Total W/L | 59% (413-289) |
| $148,460 | Career Prize Money | $4,465 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Bonzi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brian Dabul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Guido Pella
Player
Brian Dabul
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Ryderstedt
Player
Brian Dabul
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Brian Dabul
51%
(
58 of
113)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
114)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brian Dabul
Player
Paul Capdeville
63%
(
81 of
129)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
45 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
.jpg)
Brian Dabul
Player
Tiago Lopes (BRA)
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brian Dabul
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
28 of
71)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Brian Dabul
Player
Facundo Arguello
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brian Dabul
Player
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Catalin-Ionut Gard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Catalin-Ionut Gard
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Beran
Player
Catalin-Ionut Gard
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Frederik Press
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Diego-Jose Manrique-Velazquez
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Catalin-Ionut Gard
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve %
84%
(
38 of
45)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
18 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
43
Total Points Won
41
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Daniel Hobart
83%
(
91 of
110)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
0
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Aaron Addison
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Mathieu Roy
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
91%
(
48 of
53)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
0
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
48)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (342/234) | Win/Loss | 59% (413/289) |
| 57% (760/575) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (920/699) |
| 53% (6687/5971) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7849/6842) |
| 64% (112/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (67/64) |
| 58% (225/164) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (333/208) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (13/17) |
| 38% (3/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 302 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 178 | Total Double Faults | 478 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 37.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 525.7 |
| 67% (5644/8452) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3964/5987) |
| 68% (3817/5644) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2405/3964) |
| 54% (1509/2808) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (855/2023) |
| 40% (312/785) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (341/705) |
| 38% (3231/8543) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2625/5926) |
| 32% (6/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 50% (4/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (20/26) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (194/142) | Challenger W/L | 47% (85/94) |
| 71% (118/49) | Futures W/L | 64% (321/184) |
| 60% (332/555) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (401/683) |
| 27% (3/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (6/9) |
| 53% (100/188) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (67/142) |
| 55% (101/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (119/216) |
| 85% (334/284) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (400/345) |
| 14% (334/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (400/55) |
| 22% (241/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (302/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
